On October 31, AIM's amendment request will be heard

On October 31, AIM's amendment request will be heard

Varanasi: On Thursday, the district magistrate's court set October 31 as the next date for sense of hearing on the revision petition filed by Anjuman Intejamia Masajid (the management the panel for the Ganvapi mosque) against a November 17, 2022 order issued by the civil judge (senior division) fast-track court rejecting its argument that the suit Bhagwan Adi Vishweshwar Virajman and others vs. State of Uttar Pradesh could be maintained.

 The court has set October 31 for hearing on the revision petition submitted by the mosque management committee against the FTC ruling, according to AIM's attorney Akhlaque Ahmad. The plaintiff, a lady named Kiran Singh, filed this lawsuit on May 24, 2022, asking for a prohibition on Muslim admission into the Gyanvapi complex, the transfer of the property to Hindus, and permission for regular puja-archana (worship) of Lord Aadi Visheshwar. 

By decision of the district judge court in April, this lawsuit was one of the seven that were combined with 18/2022 Rakhi Singh and others vs. UP state and others. We most recently released the following articles as well.On October 19, the Supreme Court will hear appeals on the arrest of Newsclick's founder and HR director.The Supreme Court has scheduled a hearing for October 19 on the petitions filed by Prabir Purkayastha, the founder of Newsclick, and Amit Chakraborty, the HR director, who are contesting their detention and imprisonment under the UAPA. 

The accusations that money was received for spreading pro-China propaganda led to the arrests. Their appeals had already been denied by the Delhi High Court, which noted that major offenses endangering national security had been leveled against them.Karuvannur: On October 25, the court will rule on bail requests.On October 25, the PMLA special court in Kochi will determine whether to grant Aravindakshan PR and CK Jilse's bail request. They are defendants in the Karuvannur bank fraud case.

 The defense raised a concern as the court prepared to play audio excerpts of allegedly damning talks between Aravindakshan and the first accused. The prosecution opted not to submit the clips just yet despite the court's suggestion that they be presented under a sealed cover. According to Aravindakshan's argument, his client had legal business interests, and the transactions in his account were connected to those interests.

 Bail was rejected by the prosecution because of possible money laundering concerns.Mahua Moitra's demand to stop BJP MP Nishikant Dubey, an advocate, social media platforms, and media outlets from spreading false and defamatory information about her has been filed with the Delhi High Court. The petition asks the court to hear Mahua Moitra's request. In addition, Moitra has asked for both damages and an ongoing injunction. 

Dubey has demanded an investigation committee after accusing Moitra of taking payments in exchange for answering questions in Parliament. Moitra demands that the defendants delete any information that is defamatory against her and disputes the claims made against her. On Friday, there will be a hearing in this matter.