Ranchi: Four persons, including an SP reader and the BOI top manager, are implicated in connection with a bank employee's death

 Ranchi: Four persons, including an SP reader and the BOI top manager, are implicated in connection with a bank employee's death

A complaint has been filed against 4 persons in the Chutiya police station based on the testimony of the dead Supriyo Majumdar's father, who resides in Ranchi's Chutiya neighbourhood. Supriyo, who passed away, was a PO with the Bank of India. In command of the Chutiya police station According to Venkatesh Kumar, the IO of the Bongara Singh BOI case and the reader of the Ramgarh SP have been named accused based on the father's allegation.

Ranchi: Based on the testimony of the dead Supriyo Majumdar's father, who resides in Ranchi's Chutiya neighbourhood in Jharkhand, a case has been opened in the Chutiya police station against four individuals.

Supriyo, who passed away, was a PO with the Bank of India. According to the father's testimony, Bongara Singh, the chief manager of Bank of India, the investigator on the matter, and the reader of Ramgarh SP have been named as suspects, according to Chutia station in-charge Venkatesh Kumar.

Alok Mazumdar, Supriyo's father, has informed the police that those guilty for his son's killing ought to face harsh punishment.

After the statement, more action will be taken

According to police, an inquiry into this situation has begun. Supriyo's suicide note was discovered by the police. According to the police, additional action in this case would be taken when all of the accused have given statements.

In his application, the decedent's father claimed that threats of arrest and imprisonment were being made against his innocent son Supriyo. As a result, he killed himself.

Supriyo had made his declaration

In the plea submitted to the police station, the father of the deceased Supriyo Majumdar stated that the IO of Ramgarh Cantt police station had issued a notice of case number 361/18 41-A to his son Supriyo's mobile device, instructing him to present the case by August 17. Was. However, the FIR for this instance did not list his son Supriyo by name.

Supriyo's father claimed in his appeal that his son had contacted Ramgarh Cantt Police in response to the notification.

He should present his case to the SP at that point since the IO claimed that he was guilty in the case and threatened to have him arrested.

Supriyo repeatedly explained to IO

Supriyo repeatedly explained the situation to the IO throughout this time, but the IO insisted on making his case before the SP. Supriyo then arrived at the Ramgarh SP's office, but the SP wasn't there.

Even after hearing Supriyo's side, his reader who was still in the office demonstrated his anxiety of being arrested. He was urged to see the DSP and convey his position after much persuading.

IO accepted the request by pleading

He experienced the same scenario in the DSP's office. He then arrived at the case IO once more. The Case IO eventually approved his application after considerable convincing.

The father claims that after witnessing the police's actions, his kid became distressed and afraid. The son arrived at home and passed away.