Ram Mandir Pran Pratishtha: Ayodhya was the site of Ram Lala's life dedication! What are American, British, and UAE media outlets, among others, saying around the world?

"Ram Mandir Pran Pratishtha: Ayodhya was the site of Ram Lala's life dedication! What are American, British, and UAE media outlets, among others, saying around the world?

Ram Mandir Pran Pratishtha: Ayodhya was the site of Ram Lala's life dedication! What are American, British, and UAE media outlets, among others, saying around the world?

Ramlala is situated in the Ayodhya Ram temple. The whole ceremony for Ram Lalla's life consecration was carried out by Prime Minister Narendra Modi. All throughout the nation, people are celebrating the great opening of Ram Temple like it's a festival. Similar to the media in India, the media in the United Arab Emirates, Russia, and Britain are also monitoring this."

"In the massive Ram temple being constructed in Ayodhya, the consecration of Ram Lalla has been completed. There is a festive mood across the nation as a result of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's completion of Ram Lalla's consecration ceremony. Not only the Indian populace but also those residing overseas Indians are also celebrating Diwali-like events these days. The consecration ceremony of Ram Lalla at the Ram temple is a topic of great interest in the international media.

What was said by the American media?

As to the report by US network NBC News, the Hindu temple that Prime Minister Narendra Modi inaugurated on Monday has come to represent'religious conflict' in the greatest democracy globally. The primary Hindu god, Ram, has a temple that is now under construction at Ayodhya. The 30 lakh-person city of Ayodhya will become a popular tourist destination thanks in large part to this temple."

According to ABC News, the BJP has been pushing for the temple's construction for many years, and its opening will help Modi win in India, which has a large Hindu population.

According to the story, Hindu government workers in Mauritius, where half of the population is Hindu, have been granted two hours of leave to attend the consecration process, similar to what happens in India.

The inaugural event is a "gimmick for elections," according to Sunita Vishwanath, executive director of the American NGO Hindus for Human Rights, who was quoted by the American broadcaster. She also said that such actions shouldn't be carried out in the name of religion. However, in October, a legal complaint led to the suspension of Hindus for Human Rights' Twitter account in India.

The American journal quoted Sunita Vishwanath, saying that because Modi is not a priest, it is immoral and improper to execute the rite of consecration himself for political advantage.

In its report, the American publication said that the temple would be open to around 2 lakh people each day. What was said in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) newspaper?

India will reach a significant milestone with Narendra Modi's opening of the Ayodhya Hindu temple, according to a story published in the UAE weekly Gulf News.

According to sources cited by the publication, Prime Minister Narendra Modi is prepared to carry out his party's long-standing pledge. To allow for employee celebration, the central government has declared a half-day off. The stock market in India is likewise closed. A lot of states have continued to observe holidays for one or two days."

The publication went on to say, "The most significant factor in Modi's popularity among voters is his Hindu nationalism; they are grateful for his exceptional appeal and the extent to which he has elevated India." The economy of the nation is growing at a pace higher than 7%. Its stock exchange is also breaking records.

According to the publication, the 70-acre site includes the 2.7-acre temple. The temple's construction is expected to cost over Rs 15 billion. The majority of the temple complex is still under construction, and authorities estimate it will take many years to finish."

What was printed by the British media?

Prime Minister Modi has encouraged Indians to celebrate Diwali by lighting lights in their homes and neighboring temples on Monday, according to a report from the London-based news agency Reuters. Modi called the opening of the Ram Temple a historic milestone.

Political analyst Prithvi Dutta Chandra Shobhi was quoted by Reuters as saying, "The temple's inauguration seems more like the start of the general election campaign than any religious festival." The prime minister seems to be acting like a monarch conducting a significant religious rite.

According to Reuters, all of India's main opposition parties—including the Congress—rejected invitations to the Ram temple's inaugural event, sparking political turmoil in the country. The inauguration ceremony, according to opposition parties, has been turned into a political event for Modi.

"A nation's administration is commemorating a religious holiday...”

According to a report by the British network BBC World, the temple will take the place of a 16th-century mosque that was destroyed in 1992 by a Hindu mob. Following the mosque's destruction, there were nationwide riots that resulted in the deaths of over 2,000 people. The majority of the opposition parties have disassociated themselves from the temple's opening, despite the fact that India's biggest movie stars, businessmen, and cricket players are attending. According to the opposition, PM Modi is using the Ram Temple's opening to further his political ambitions.

According to BBC World, there have been accusations made by critics that the government is celebrating a religious celebration in a nation that is constitutionally secular.

The British broadcaster said that the nation is excitedly awaiting the temple and that Prime Minister Modi has called the temple's building a huge success. The newspaper quoted Prime Minister Modi as saying, "Earlier this month, in a message, he stated that many generations were waiting for this moment." At the inauguration ceremony, they said, he would speak for all 1.4 billion Indians."

 

According to the article, there are notable religious saints who have said that it is against Hindu faith to conduct certain rites at the temple since it is not yet finished. Numerous opposition figures have also made the decision to avoid it.

What did the Russian government media publish?

According to a report by Russia Today (RT), the building of the Ram temple in Ayodhya has completely changed the city.

According to the newspaper, "Land prices are soaring in Ayodhya, which is thought to be the birthplace of the Hindu God, and extensive infrastructure work is currently underway." An article in the Economic Times claims that the government has approved over a dozen projects to construct new hotels, and that almost $4 billion has already been paid for infrastructure.

According to a Russian tabloid, the prime minister promised to build the shrine as part of his platform for the 2019 election. A few months before to the national elections, the temple was officially opened. 'Hindu activists' razed a mosque from the 16th century, on which the temple is being built. He thought that the Ram temple had been demolished in order to construct the mosque. When the mosque was destroyed, there were widespread rioting.

What did the newspaper in Nepal say?

The prime minister of the secular democratic republic of India, Narendra Modi, is gaining more attention at the temple's opening than Lord Ram, according to an article published in the country's major daily, The Kathmandu Post.

According to the journal, Ayodhya has destroyed India's secularism and the country has strayed far from its founding principles.

What was said by Aljazeera, the Qatari TV network?

'India's secularism has been buried beneath the mountain of saffron politics,' claims an opinion piece from Qatar-based TV network Al Jazeera. It has been said that a secular Indian prime minister should not open a temple in an essay authored by political analyst Insia Vahnwati.

According to the story, Muslims are still in anguish over the destruction of the Babri Temple. Numerous individuals still recall the lives lost in the riots that ensued after the destruction. Although there were political assurances that the mosque would be restored, it never materialized.